05-14-2015, 12:00 AM
We don't know the end of the path.
I need to actually read and devise something for this thread since its apparent the OP is serious...
Maybe I'll figure how to properly label the top. You shouldn't refer to them with our words, Law, Way, Path, Principle, its to the extent of our words, The Law or Way of One. At this level there is no manifestation, no time, no space. Them came Free Will, still no time or space. Then came Love. Still no time or space, then came light, then came time and space aided by Love/Light.
Philosophically its a fallacious name in that it only implies simply All Is One. You'd be better off calling it The Philosophy of One if you want to avoid incorrectly labeling it. Ra says it in the first session I think that to the extent of our language allows wed call their philosophy the Law of One.
Since at those levels they're less Law and more nonunderstood mechanics, I can't say itd be proper to debate the literal wording of the named philosophy.
I need to actually read and devise something for this thread since its apparent the OP is serious...
Maybe I'll figure how to properly label the top. You shouldn't refer to them with our words, Law, Way, Path, Principle, its to the extent of our words, The Law or Way of One. At this level there is no manifestation, no time, no space. Them came Free Will, still no time or space. Then came Love. Still no time or space, then came light, then came time and space aided by Love/Light.
Philosophically its a fallacious name in that it only implies simply All Is One. You'd be better off calling it The Philosophy of One if you want to avoid incorrectly labeling it. Ra says it in the first session I think that to the extent of our language allows wed call their philosophy the Law of One.
Since at those levels they're less Law and more nonunderstood mechanics, I can't say itd be proper to debate the literal wording of the named philosophy.