05-13-2015, 03:15 AM
I think Ra is being facetious, in a way.
That being said, I think we have to look at what it means to "be".
To say I am this or I am that, we can look at ourselves and say well if I am those things, I must BE those things. Usually we are associating what we are with what our being is. Yet, how do we know what our 'being' is?
I believe there is a core from which all stems, this Ra calls the One Infinite Creator or Intelligent Infinity. They also express that it has two primary modes, potential and kinetic. There is a core of potential which all kinetic energy, intelligent energy is generated from. I believe the potential, the core, is actually what we consider 'inside' ourselves to be Creator, that which is Intelligent Infinity and which is the One within.
Again, we see that there "to be the Creator".
Interestingly, in this context it seems that Ra is saying we become the Creator. This suggests to me that what they mean is that through knowing ourselves (we learn we are the Creator), accepting ourselves (accepting we are the Creator) we become the Creator, we understand that our being is the One Infinite Creator, Intelligent Infinity THAT is ALL being.
Thus, to "be" ultimately is always rooted in the Creator. However, let us look then at what it means to 'be all things'. If we are referring to being, then we are referring to the Creator that we are. If we are being the Creator, then we are being all things. If we are being all things, then we are the Creator. Thus, to be all things and to be the Creator are synonymous.
So, the Creator in us is being all things. I believe Ra is actually the Creator, the One Infinite Creator, I see the Creator in Ra, as well as in the all. I believe that the statement Ra is making in this particular quote and these exact words are actually an attempt of Ra as the Creator to speak directly and make direct contact with that part of the group and of Don (whom the comment is directed at) that is the Creator as well. The Creator was attempting to make direct acknowledgement of itself.
So what does that mean? Well, this is where I come back to the two modes of the Creator and also look at the stated intention of Ra. Ra's purpose in the contact was to express the Law of One through answering questions. However, I believe they also communicated the Law of One through energy transfer and attempted to do this from Creator to Creator and so many of the veiled words of Ra are really these communications that are taking place beyond the words themselves.
That being said, I think that we have to be careful not to misidentify things for what they are. Everything is the Creator and the Creator is Everthing, but things as things are only themselves even if that includes Intelligent Infinity. However, any one thing cannot be said to be Intelligent Infinity except Intelligent Infinity. That is the One Infinite Creator.
Thus, I believe that Ra is not referring to the self, the identity and soul or Logos and asking if it is all things. They are asking Don if he is the Creator, or not? In this question was offered a choice. It was offering Don an opportunity to see that he is the One Infinite Creator.
That being said, I think we have to look at what it means to "be".
To say I am this or I am that, we can look at ourselves and say well if I am those things, I must BE those things. Usually we are associating what we are with what our being is. Yet, how do we know what our 'being' is?
I believe there is a core from which all stems, this Ra calls the One Infinite Creator or Intelligent Infinity. They also express that it has two primary modes, potential and kinetic. There is a core of potential which all kinetic energy, intelligent energy is generated from. I believe the potential, the core, is actually what we consider 'inside' ourselves to be Creator, that which is Intelligent Infinity and which is the One within.
Again, we see that there "to be the Creator".
Quote:74.11 Questioner: Now, what I am trying to get at is how these disciplines affect the energy centers and the power, shall I say, of the white magician. Could you, will you tell me how that works?
Ra: I am Ra. The heart of the discipline of the personality is threefold. One, know yourself. Two, accept yourself. Three, become the Creator.
The third step is that step which, when accomplished, renders one the most humble servant of all, transparent in personality and completely able to know and accept other-selves. In relation to the pursuit of the magical working the continuing discipline of the personality involves the adept in knowing itself, accepting itself, and thus clearing the path towards the great indigo gateway to the Creator. To become the Creator is to become all that there is. There is then no personality in the sense with which the adept begins its learn/teaching. As the consciousness of the indigo ray becomes more crystalline, more work may be done; more may be expressed from intelligent infinity.
Interestingly, in this context it seems that Ra is saying we become the Creator. This suggests to me that what they mean is that through knowing ourselves (we learn we are the Creator), accepting ourselves (accepting we are the Creator) we become the Creator, we understand that our being is the One Infinite Creator, Intelligent Infinity THAT is ALL being.
Thus, to "be" ultimately is always rooted in the Creator. However, let us look then at what it means to 'be all things'. If we are referring to being, then we are referring to the Creator that we are. If we are being the Creator, then we are being all things. If we are being all things, then we are the Creator. Thus, to be all things and to be the Creator are synonymous.
So, the Creator in us is being all things. I believe Ra is actually the Creator, the One Infinite Creator, I see the Creator in Ra, as well as in the all. I believe that the statement Ra is making in this particular quote and these exact words are actually an attempt of Ra as the Creator to speak directly and make direct contact with that part of the group and of Don (whom the comment is directed at) that is the Creator as well. The Creator was attempting to make direct acknowledgement of itself.
So what does that mean? Well, this is where I come back to the two modes of the Creator and also look at the stated intention of Ra. Ra's purpose in the contact was to express the Law of One through answering questions. However, I believe they also communicated the Law of One through energy transfer and attempted to do this from Creator to Creator and so many of the veiled words of Ra are really these communications that are taking place beyond the words themselves.
That being said, I think that we have to be careful not to misidentify things for what they are. Everything is the Creator and the Creator is Everthing, but things as things are only themselves even if that includes Intelligent Infinity. However, any one thing cannot be said to be Intelligent Infinity except Intelligent Infinity. That is the One Infinite Creator.
Thus, I believe that Ra is not referring to the self, the identity and soul or Logos and asking if it is all things. They are asking Don if he is the Creator, or not? In this question was offered a choice. It was offering Don an opportunity to see that he is the One Infinite Creator.