05-12-2015, 11:48 PM
Youd be better off pronouncing it the Way of One.
Law insists it is imposed or forced upon to human culture, its closer to a choice in our octave, a Way.
I think you're trying to attach a metaphysics philosophical debate to a purely philosophical concept riddled with metaphysics examples. If youd rather integrate together rather than define differences, you could just make a LOO Metaphysics Study starting at the basic golden spiral design to the incredibly complex fractal manner of intelligently spreading Love/Light to develop the holographic universe to the illogical/hard to understand Beingness of Consciousness, Infinity, and Unity.
I disagree unsurely about infinity not having unity at one point. Infinity implies unity. Infinity came first and Unity was with it. They were simultaneous which is why I often wonder why no one views simultaneity as a prereq like infinity, unity, and beingness to our current place.
Youd have to step back from the placing of the Law or Way of One as the Capstone. It is the First Distortion, the second step down of you will. The first being True thing derived the original Ways of Infinity discovering itself.
The Law of One is not a decree. It is a Way of Beingness.
You can break it. You can choose to disconnect and look away. You can even deny it. It won't force you to believe. It wont make you miserable for disagreeing.
It is more than a universal Way, it is a Conscious Way. Seek the Law of One to know yourself. Seek the Way of One to know yourself. There is only one. The Law of One is part of that. It isn't the one true absolute way. Its a partof a way.
I think of it as the Way of the Creator. The path of reexperience starts at the Law of One.
So in an infinity/unity principle we have semantics if you were to combine the two. We also have an inherent issue with compatibility. One says first came Infinity then Unity.While another says both are simultaneous.
You can Only have both if you wish to heavily complicate that combined system with pparadox which upthat high is not properly applied for paradoxes unify and cease before that point.
I appreciatewhat you're going for though. I wish I could derive a reciprocal holofractal system to mirror the creation i find myself in.
Beyond that. More metaphysics would be nice. We have foundations, we just need to build.
Law insists it is imposed or forced upon to human culture, its closer to a choice in our octave, a Way.
I think you're trying to attach a metaphysics philosophical debate to a purely philosophical concept riddled with metaphysics examples. If youd rather integrate together rather than define differences, you could just make a LOO Metaphysics Study starting at the basic golden spiral design to the incredibly complex fractal manner of intelligently spreading Love/Light to develop the holographic universe to the illogical/hard to understand Beingness of Consciousness, Infinity, and Unity.
I disagree unsurely about infinity not having unity at one point. Infinity implies unity. Infinity came first and Unity was with it. They were simultaneous which is why I often wonder why no one views simultaneity as a prereq like infinity, unity, and beingness to our current place.
Youd have to step back from the placing of the Law or Way of One as the Capstone. It is the First Distortion, the second step down of you will. The first being True thing derived the original Ways of Infinity discovering itself.
The Law of One is not a decree. It is a Way of Beingness.
You can break it. You can choose to disconnect and look away. You can even deny it. It won't force you to believe. It wont make you miserable for disagreeing.
It is more than a universal Way, it is a Conscious Way. Seek the Law of One to know yourself. Seek the Way of One to know yourself. There is only one. The Law of One is part of that. It isn't the one true absolute way. Its a partof a way.
I think of it as the Way of the Creator. The path of reexperience starts at the Law of One.
So in an infinity/unity principle we have semantics if you were to combine the two. We also have an inherent issue with compatibility. One says first came Infinity then Unity.While another says both are simultaneous.
You can Only have both if you wish to heavily complicate that combined system with pparadox which upthat high is not properly applied for paradoxes unify and cease before that point.
I appreciatewhat you're going for though. I wish I could derive a reciprocal holofractal system to mirror the creation i find myself in.
Beyond that. More metaphysics would be nice. We have foundations, we just need to build.