08-06-2010, 01:31 AM
Hey guys,
I also "love this thread", if I may say!
The move has gone well, and today is the first day our internet has been on (San Francisco is lovely by the way, I would recommend a visit, or a move, to anyone).
3D, there is much you have written that begs follow up, but due to my limited time tonight I will simply quote the following for further discussion (for now):
Indeed! But I think you mis-read me here. What I intended to query was more on the lines of putting together the idea that the universe is mostly (99%) composed of matter that is invisible to us (which we presume to be higher density matter, be they planets, M/B/S complexes, or et cetera AND the notion that we actually have, according to Ra, an example of a higher density celestial body in our own solar system, that being Venus.
Ra suggests that Venus is presently at the 5th/6th density level. If this is so and we maintain that all densities are currently co-existing in our same s/t universe, then it sort of tosses out the idea stated above, that higher density planets (at least) are dark matter in nature. Rather, it seems to suggest that the planet we observe now is 5th/6th density, but since one of the characteristics of a 5th or 6th density entity is non-physicality, the 700 degree Fahrenheit surface temperatures would not be problematic. Or perhaps I am understanding this all wrong?
(not only possible, but probable my friends...)
I eagerly await your reply, although I will un-pack many a moving box before I respond again, very likely.
Yours,
L.
I also "love this thread", if I may say!
The move has gone well, and today is the first day our internet has been on (San Francisco is lovely by the way, I would recommend a visit, or a move, to anyone).3D, there is much you have written that begs follow up, but due to my limited time tonight I will simply quote the following for further discussion (for now):
(07-29-2010, 05:09 PM)3D Sunset Wrote:(07-29-2010, 12:39 PM)Lavazza Wrote: If a planetary entity moves out of 3rd density activation and in to higher densities, then wouldn't that sphere be invisible to us, being that we are 3rd density? It should fall in to the category of "dark matter" as our science calls it, and not be visible to us, much as we metaphysics fans assume that dark matter comprises other higher density matter.
Again, as I see it, the purpose of the Logos and sub-logos is not to advance spiritually within the densities (that is to say that a 2D planet is not at 2D spiritual advancement, it's "being-ness" as a planet may well, however, be part of its spiritual path), but rather to provide the environment for m/b/s to advance. A truly STO activity, by the way.
Indeed! But I think you mis-read me here. What I intended to query was more on the lines of putting together the idea that the universe is mostly (99%) composed of matter that is invisible to us (which we presume to be higher density matter, be they planets, M/B/S complexes, or et cetera AND the notion that we actually have, according to Ra, an example of a higher density celestial body in our own solar system, that being Venus.
Ra suggests that Venus is presently at the 5th/6th density level. If this is so and we maintain that all densities are currently co-existing in our same s/t universe, then it sort of tosses out the idea stated above, that higher density planets (at least) are dark matter in nature. Rather, it seems to suggest that the planet we observe now is 5th/6th density, but since one of the characteristics of a 5th or 6th density entity is non-physicality, the 700 degree Fahrenheit surface temperatures would not be problematic. Or perhaps I am understanding this all wrong?
(not only possible, but probable my friends...)I eagerly await your reply, although I will un-pack many a moving box before I respond again, very likely.
Yours,
L.