04-14-2015, 03:56 AM
(This post was last modified: 04-14-2015, 04:00 AM by APeacefulWarrior.)
From a little further down, here's a great example of what I'm talking about:
Literally the ONLY thing accomplished here is getting them to think this Bill Brooks person is deliberately manipulating them, and then it simply dodges all other questions that might have actually gotten to the root of things. That "Lessons are valuable" line is especially obnoxious. It's not even clear from the answers whether this was deliberate on Bill Brooks' part. It's implied, but not confirmed. (Ie, plenty of people will make up BS for the sake of attention without a larger goal, but that would still fall under the heading of "control" from a very reductionist standpoint.)
Not to mention "Security on 3rd Density? You must be joking!" What a great way of increasing the INsecurity of the group. Wouldn't Ra have been saying at that point to look towards Intelligent Infinity to find comfort\security in the knowledge that our 3D trials are transient and ultimately (almost) meaningless in the grand scheme?
The more I read, the more I'm convinced this material is poison.
Quote:Q: Alright. This Bill Brooks situation: is there any relationship between the Bill Brooks communication and the incident with the radiator in the van?
A: No.
Q: Well, we still haven’t come up with any solution on this van business.
(A) In fact, I checked all around and under the van for any device that might be magnetically attached to the van, and I could find nothing. I was almost sure that there would be something, some mechanical or electronic device, but I could not find anything. And I have no idea what that means, the magnetic sphere of the van. Is this something material which is to be found?
A: What caused car window to explode?
Q: You are saying it is me that does these things?
A: Maybe.
Q: So we are having more of the fun shattering and explosion events. And, it WAS and explosion, wasn’t it? And I was awfully good at that for quite awhile.
(A) But this is not a complete explanation because we were asking about this man who was helping, and apparently, from your answers, it was clear that there is something to be learned about this man, and that this incident, this explosion...
A: Many will be watching you.
Q: Well, since this guy was watching and came and helped, maybe that would indicate that he was a benevolent watching person?
A: No.
Q: Well, THAT makes me feel secure!
A: Security on 3rd density? You must be joking!!
Q: Well speaking of ‘watched by many,’ what about this Bill Brooks? He was already to come and he was going to charge on down here and Ark started thinking he was manipulating and maneuvering a bit, and he did a few things that made me feel a little uncomfortable, and puzzled me because they didn’t quite fit or sit well. So, as a result, we cancelled. But, I am divided in my thoughts about this. I’m sure you are aware of the long conversation we had about it earlier, so tell me about Bill Brooks ‘sword dream.’ Was he making this dream up?
A: Yes.
Q: Was the dream made up to manipulate me particularly?
A: Not just you.
Q: Okay. What is the agenda behind the manipulation?
A: Control.
Q: Who is behind Bill Brooks that wishes to control? Is it Bill Brooks himself, or someone or some agency behind him?
A: Lessons are valuable to those who learn.
Q: Is it a human agency here behind Bill Brooks or is it 4th density. I would think it would have to be a 3rd density group otherwise why would they want all the transcripts? I would say it would have to be a 3rd density agency or his own personal agenda that he wants to plagiarize the transcripts...
A: Two good guesses.
Literally the ONLY thing accomplished here is getting them to think this Bill Brooks person is deliberately manipulating them, and then it simply dodges all other questions that might have actually gotten to the root of things. That "Lessons are valuable" line is especially obnoxious. It's not even clear from the answers whether this was deliberate on Bill Brooks' part. It's implied, but not confirmed. (Ie, plenty of people will make up BS for the sake of attention without a larger goal, but that would still fall under the heading of "control" from a very reductionist standpoint.)
Not to mention "Security on 3rd Density? You must be joking!" What a great way of increasing the INsecurity of the group. Wouldn't Ra have been saying at that point to look towards Intelligent Infinity to find comfort\security in the knowledge that our 3D trials are transient and ultimately (almost) meaningless in the grand scheme?
The more I read, the more I'm convinced this material is poison.