04-07-2015, 09:43 AM
(04-07-2015, 03:29 AM)AngelofDeath Wrote:(04-06-2015, 08:40 PM)Lighthead Wrote:(04-06-2015, 08:17 PM)AngelofDeath Wrote:(04-06-2015, 08:14 PM)Lighthead Wrote:(04-06-2015, 05:37 PM)AngelofDeath Wrote: I'm gonna be bold and jump on to this particular point. WHY is enjoying the taste a poor excuse? Why would it be considered purely an excuse at all?
Note: I have not and am not actually defending either side of this argument, I don't think either side 'needs defending'. I believe humans are adaptive and we are CAPABLE of many, many things. That some say one thing is absolutely better and others say another thing is better leaves me with only myself to decide. In some ways, I think I view myself as a scavenger when it comes to food, I will eat mostly anything.
This density is the density of choice. So we have to base our actions on whether they are STS or STO to evolve to the next phase. I'm speaking of the average 3rd density entity who is concerned about efficiently utilizing catalyst. So if we are concerned about evolving into the next STO phase, we have to start with those entities that are closest to us.
That doesn't really answer my question.
I didn't answer your question directly because I don't see why whether something tastes good is a very important consideration in determining whether something is ethical or not. You spoke of morbidity before, but, to me, that seems morbid.
Do you enjoy the taste of vegetables?
I actually do enjoy the taste of vegetables. I don't like bland salads. My salads would just be cucumbers and tomatoes. But I've been mixing them (the cucumbers and tomatoes) into the main dish, cold. Vietnamese dishes are served a similar way.