Ra's Statements About 2D Entities

[Diana]

I feel not responsible for the animal as I believe it is it's desired experience that is unfolding as the One Intelligent Infinity experiencing many-ness. 

You made a choice to eat an animal. You are responsible for your choice. The implications of your choices are debatable, not your responsibility in making them. 

How can you possibly know what the animals' desired experiences are? Because all is well, all is good, all is as it should be? Because all is the One Infinite Creator? Then you simply do nothing at all, and just float through existence doing whatever? If there is a One Infinite Creator, what would be the purpose of creating life forms that do nothing? If that was the case, why would Ra have talked to us at all?

Perhaps you are correct that the animals' desired experience here is to suffer and be food for humans. It doesn't matter what their desired experience is, it matters what yours is. Is your desired experience to ingest a being who suffered to be food for you, who didn't want to be slaughtered? This is YOUR choice, whatever the choices of the animals are. 

Even if you were some ridiculously advanced light being from a much higher octave, whose lightness of being was so far removed from physicality you could somehow inject love into every action regardless of what that action was. You would still be setting an example for 3D humans that enslaving, causing suffering to, and eating slaughtered animals is okay. Why not, as a light being, eat closer to light if you must eat: plants that photosynthesize. Plants that need to spread their seeds so attract animals to eat them? There is so much evidence that plants require this symbiosis, that they want to be food.

Everything anyone does changes everything. Ripples in a pond is a good visual. Even better: interference patterns. The double-slit experiment proves that just observing something affects it.