07-25-2010, 11:25 PM
(07-25-2010, 11:03 PM)Questioner Wrote: [quote='Confused' pid='17318' dateline='1280112627']
Could you please expand or rephrase your ideas here? I'm afraid I don't understand what you mean by enforcement and empowerment in this context.
By enforcement of the design of the archetypes, I had the following quote from Ra in mind (session 92) -
Quote:Although this is correct it is not as perceptive as the notice that the Priestess, as this figure has been called, sits within a structure in which polarity, symbolized as you correctly noted by the light and dark pillars, is an integral and necessary part. The unfed mind has no polarity just as intelligent infinity has none. The nature of the sub-sub-sub-Logos which offers the third-density experience is one of polarity, not by choice but by careful design..
We perceive an unclear statement. The polarity of Potentiator is there not for the Matrix to choose. It is there for the Matrix to accept as given
What Ra called 'careful design', I addressed as enforcement.
By empowerment -
Quote:There are many among your social memory complex distortion who, at this time/space, engage daily, as you would put it, in the working upon the Law of One in one of its primal distortions; that is, the ways of love. However, if this same entity, being biased from the depths of its mind/body/spirit complex towards love/light, were then to accept the responsibility for each moment of the time/space accumulation of present moments available to it, such an entity can empower its progress in much the same way as we described the empowering of the call of your social complex distortion to the Confederation.
From your description of the Enneagram, I feel that it allows us to watch our minds in order to accept responsibility for each moment.