01-13-2015, 06:15 PM
(01-08-2015, 01:09 PM)Jade Wrote: When I've read the books, I take a more generalized approach to the word when Ra uses it as an example for the negative polarity. Like this sentence in 7.15, after the sentence in question:
Quote:Their numbers are perhaps one-tenth ours at any point in the space/time continuum as the problem of spiritual entropy causes them to experience constant disintegration of their social memory complexes.
I have almost exclusively interpreted that to mean that there is 1/10th the number of negative polarity than positive polarity, IN GENERAL, due to the problem of spiritual entropy.
As that the 1/10th statement comes immediately on the heels of talking about the Orion Empire, I interpret the 10% to be a measure of the Orion group relative to the Confederation's numbers. Which for me is psychologically encouraging. : ) Especially in light of the fact that other... sectors of the infinite universe might have a very different ratio.
(01-13-2015, 02:54 AM)geomatria Wrote:(01-06-2015, 06:14 PM)Bring4th_GLB Wrote: As far as I can tell, it does indeed seem to be a glaring inconsistency. In both quotes Ra is talking about membership in the Orion Empire according to density of origin.
7.15: http://www.lawofone.info/results.php?q=7.15
48.6: http://www.lawofone.info/results.php?q=48.6
I agree with you that Ra appears to be talking about Orion membership in both cases, rather than just the negative polarity.
Consider the possibility that in 7.15, Ra is counting social memory complexes, but in 48.6 Ra is counting individual mind/body/spirit complexes, and that the size of the Orion 5th density social memory complexes are on average much smaller than for 4th density.
Here are some actual numbers that are just pulled out of the air that may be off of the real values by many orders of magnitude, but may help illustrate this point. The Orion group includes, for example:
Thus in 7.15 when Ra says that there are "a larger number of fourth density, a similarly large number of fifth density, and very few sixth-density entities comprising this organization" they are referring to social memory complexes as the "entities" (just as Ra is an entity even though Ra is a social memory complex). In 48.6 when Ra says "There are very, very few fifth-density Orion members" this is also accurate, since for every 100,000 4th density negative mind/body/spirit complexes in the Orion group, there is only 1 5th density negative mind/body/spirit complex, according to the above contrived example.
- 1,000 4th density negative social memory complexes.
Each 4th density negative social memory complex contains 3,000,000 mind/body/spirit complexes.
- 1,000 5th density negative social memory complexes.
Each 5th density negative social memory complex contains 30 mind/body/spirit complexes.
In other words, within the Orion group, there are large numbers of both 4th and 5th density social memory complexes, but the size of each 5th density social memory complex is on average much smaller than for 4th density.
That's the closest yet I've seen to a bona fide solution to the inconsistency without writing it up as "transmission error", or "social memory complex brain fart". Thanks, Geomatria!
I don't know that that can be conclusively determined, though. The statement you propose may be speaking about individuals within a social memory complex (48.6: "There are very, very few fifth-density Orion members"), could just as well be using the term "members" for social memory complex. That's the direction I would lean, but you could be hitting the head on the nail.
Explanation by the tongue makes most things clear, but love unexplained is clearer. - Rumi