Thanks GLB.
I came on here to check out David's llresearch channeling but saw your post.
I'm not sure these things necessarily do affect Davids work, or if they do, they may effect it positively. How can I say this having just Ra quoted in the opposite direction? Well, one can only guess, or check my blog.
Neither do I believe he is necessarily a wanderer of Ra, that could be why Carla didn't feel right about it. I get both perspectives. But really, he could be a wanderer of Ra. When I checked his post I felt the light blocked on the part where he was writing about him and Edgar (Since I theorised about David which could have reflected there). I don't know where you go for therapy on these sorts of issues. Lol. I also sometimes feel both a benevolence, especially today, and a peculiar malice in regards to his readings. I think that malice, now I have to explain it, is my perception that where he thought his higher self was giving him peculiarly painful initiations, I wonder if when he didn't take the path of his higher self it was infact the negative equivalent of that entity that tried to squelch him. But by far the strongest sensation is benevolence.
This is a good quote.
To be honest I feel completely psychicly fused to the guy. His posts are so synchronous to my personal experience it really is like we are thinking with the same brain. There seems to be a perception of conflict, like I'm having a go at him, but there is none. I suppose it grew from me thinking this subject was taboo and that, to be honest comes, from my intimidation over the whole Jim and Carla (i.e. I don't think of Carla clearly) thing because my own synchronicities/ dreams/ compulsive experiences etc. surrounding Don and strong personal experiences which don't have a back up in a 'feeling' sense. So in a clear psychological sense it goes 'not able to think of Carla's perspective clearly, flinching away. Because of flinching away not able to think, there is no threat so it's not taboo.' And so on.
It's like, I'm skating round all these loving philosophies and somehow managing to not learn love.
I came on here to check out David's llresearch channeling but saw your post.
I'm not sure these things necessarily do affect Davids work, or if they do, they may effect it positively. How can I say this having just Ra quoted in the opposite direction? Well, one can only guess, or check my blog.
Neither do I believe he is necessarily a wanderer of Ra, that could be why Carla didn't feel right about it. I get both perspectives. But really, he could be a wanderer of Ra. When I checked his post I felt the light blocked on the part where he was writing about him and Edgar (Since I theorised about David which could have reflected there). I don't know where you go for therapy on these sorts of issues. Lol. I also sometimes feel both a benevolence, especially today, and a peculiar malice in regards to his readings. I think that malice, now I have to explain it, is my perception that where he thought his higher self was giving him peculiarly painful initiations, I wonder if when he didn't take the path of his higher self it was infact the negative equivalent of that entity that tried to squelch him. But by far the strongest sensation is benevolence.
Quote: But I appreciate that, thanks to his reliance on the Law of One and other similarly minded material, and his own ultimately mystical seeking, David retains in his service a core element of the eternity philosophy that is the heart and substance of all mystical teaching. The Law of One being one such representation of eternity philosophy.
This is a good quote.
To be honest I feel completely psychicly fused to the guy. His posts are so synchronous to my personal experience it really is like we are thinking with the same brain. There seems to be a perception of conflict, like I'm having a go at him, but there is none. I suppose it grew from me thinking this subject was taboo and that, to be honest comes, from my intimidation over the whole Jim and Carla (i.e. I don't think of Carla clearly) thing because my own synchronicities/ dreams/ compulsive experiences etc. surrounding Don and strong personal experiences which don't have a back up in a 'feeling' sense. So in a clear psychological sense it goes 'not able to think of Carla's perspective clearly, flinching away. Because of flinching away not able to think, there is no threat so it's not taboo.' And so on.
It's like, I'm skating round all these loving philosophies and somehow managing to not learn love.