11-22-2014, 02:16 PM
This quote hear speaks a lot of this subject to me. talking about George Patton:
See here it says that for this "positive" entity, they were also simultaneously polarizing negatively, so the whole idea of "positive" and "negative" INDIVIDUALS, makes absolutely no sense to me. There is only positive or negative polarization and the amount one does one or the other in a life and that is why I find it is not so obvious or easy using historical records (which do not actually convey the actuality of experience) to make the judgement of the dominant polarization in an individual's life, especially since in history many assumptions, images and concepts are applied to people according to the culture or biases of the historian.
Patton also seems to me to be as "glory-pumped" as they come, always interested in courage and rank and title and the empowerment of his image to lead his troops and he was obviously working in an "us vs them" scenario. Yet, he still was able to polarize positively.
Quote: (34.17) Ra: I am Ra. This will be the last full question of this working. The one of whom you speak, known as George, was one in whom the programming of previous incarnations had created a pattern or inertia which was irresistible in its incarnation in your time/space. This entity was of a strong yellow-ray activation with frequent green-ray openings and occasional blue-ray openings. However, it did not find itself able to break the mold of previous traumatic experiences of a bellicose nature.
This entity polarized somewhat towards the positive in its incarnation due to its singleness of belief in truth and beauty. This entity was quite sensitive. It felt a great honor/duty to the preservation of that which was felt by the entity to be true, beautiful, and in need of defense. This entity perceived itself as a gallant figure. It polarized somewhat towards the negative in its lack of understanding the green ray it carried with it, rejecting the forgiveness principle which is implicit in universal love.
The sum total of this incarnation vibrationally was a slight increase in positive polarity but a decrease in harvestability due to the rejection of the Law or Way of Responsibility; that is, seeing universal love, yet still it fought on.
See here it says that for this "positive" entity, they were also simultaneously polarizing negatively, so the whole idea of "positive" and "negative" INDIVIDUALS, makes absolutely no sense to me. There is only positive or negative polarization and the amount one does one or the other in a life and that is why I find it is not so obvious or easy using historical records (which do not actually convey the actuality of experience) to make the judgement of the dominant polarization in an individual's life, especially since in history many assumptions, images and concepts are applied to people according to the culture or biases of the historian.
Patton also seems to me to be as "glory-pumped" as they come, always interested in courage and rank and title and the empowerment of his image to lead his troops and he was obviously working in an "us vs them" scenario. Yet, he still was able to polarize positively.
![[+]](https://www.bring4th.org/forums/images/collapse_collapsed.png)