Trying to FIND a passage in the Law of One ...

[Mikesch]

Hey Gang,

Was looking for a passage where Don asks about Déjà vu and Ra hits him with the law of confusion. At least I think that's how it went.... can't seem to find it in the search.

Hey Mikesch, this might help:

http://www.lawofone.info/results.php?c=N...+Confusion

The only thing on that list that might be considered "deja vu" that the group experienced was the vision of the hawk, which Don took to be a negative sign and kept probing Ra about it:

97.3 ↥ Questioner: I’ve been doing some consideration of the appearance of the hawk and have made this analysis of the bird in Card Three. The bird is a message from the higher self, and the position of the wings in Card Three, one wing pointing toward the female, indicates that it is a message to the female acting as catalyst for the mind. The position of the downward wing indicates that the message is of a negative or of a nature indicating the inappropriateness of certain mental activity or plan. Would Ra comment on that?

Ra: I am Ra. No.

97.4 ↥ Questioner: Is the reason for this lack of comment the first distortion?

Ra: I am Ra. This is correct.

97.5 ↥ Questioner: I have analyzed the hawk that I saw immediately after returning from the house in Atlanta as a message, most probably from my higher self, indicating that the plan of moving was not the best; was not too appropriate since, without the hawk, everything would have continued as planned with no added catalyst. This single catalyst of a remarkable nature then, logically, from my point of view, could only mean that there was a message as to the inappropriateness of the plan for some reason yet to be discovered. Would Ra comment on that?

Ra: I am Ra. We tread as close as possible to the Law of Confusion in suggesting that not all wingèd creatures have an archetypical meaning. We might suggest that the noticing of shared subjectively notable phenomena is common when, in another incarnational experience, work significant to the service of increased polarity has been shared. These subjectively interesting shared phenomena then act as a means of communication, the nature of which cannot be discussed by those outside of the shared incarnational experience without the interference with the free will of each entity involved in the complex of subjectively meaningful events

Though I think this would be more "synchronicity" instead of "deja vu", but I think deja vu is a type of synchronicity?

Hmmm, I don't think that was it. I was certain Don flat out asked "Can you explain deja vu?" and Ra refused. I did try searching for the law of confusion but nothing popped up on the subject. I'm beginning to wonder if I even read it at all... I just remember my reaction, I was like "Oh man I wanted to know that!! (from Ra's perspective)" Anyway, I was talking about it with a friend I just wanted to see if I had read it correctly.