Bring4th Forums
  • Login Register
    Login
    Username:
    Password:
  • Archive Home
  • Members
  • Team
  • Help
  • More
    • About Us
    • Library
    • L/L Research Store
User Links
  • Login Register
    Login
    Username:
    Password:

    Menu Home Today At a Glance Members CSC & Team Help
    Also visit... About Us Library Blog L/L Research Store Adept Biorhythms

    As of Friday, August 5th, 2022, the Bring4th forums on this page have been converted to a permanent read-only archive. If you would like to continue your journey with Bring4th, the new forums are now at https://discourse.bring4th.org.

    You are invited to enjoy many years worth of forum messages brought forth by our community of seekers. The site search feature remains available to discover topics of interest. (July 22, 2022) x

    Bring4th Bring4th Studies Strictly Law of One Material Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another?

    Thread: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another?


    unity100 (Offline)

    Member
    Posts: 4,502
    Threads: 152
    Joined: May 2010
    #40
    07-13-2010, 06:43 PM
    (07-13-2010, 06:35 PM)βαθμιαίος Wrote: "When the archetype is translated without regard for magical propriety into the manifested daily actions of an individual the greatest distortions may take place and great infringement upon the free will of others is possible." This is referring to third-density individuals.

    this is a quote from book 4 apparently, and its related to magical adept work. however, the context it is in is also important. you should link the question number too.

    Quote:"To take an entity before it is ready and offer it the scepter of magical power is to infringe in an unbalanced manner." Third density adepts could do this; it's the reason why mystery schools take great care not to give initiates more powerful tools than they are ready for.

    this has a fine point - are those who can do this the third density adepts, or the entity/source which is in the teacher position, and gives them these information. is a third density adept, able to be able to teach other third density adepts, or, other third density entities ...

    if not, and its probably not, this again would refer to any kind of source that is implementing a plan from outside the veil, like the group aided the atlanteans, and Ra contact in egypt. that means, the veil/quarantine is still a factor in the infringement.

    Quote:"Infringement upon free will occurs in this circumstance only if the entity doing the working ascribes the authorship of this event to its self or its own skills." In other words, had Jesus, say, claimed authorship over his miracles he would have been infringing on free will.

    again, context is needed for analysis. you should link question nos.

    Quote:Unless you're distinguishing communication from conquest, that is contradicted by this: "In the second circumstance, a mass landing would create a loss of polarization due to the infringement upon the free will of the planet."

    yes i am. actually this is one of the ironic points in all this free will business - it is ok if you lie to population, make believe in some god, and then manifest as the messengers of that god. landing seems to be a violation, but, what if enough people are made believe that the landing ships are 'chariots of god' and the entities landing within them are 'angels of god' ...

    Quote:It may not be the density in which wisdom is learned, but it certainly sought: "the vibration love being that density in which those who have learned to do an activity called “loving” without significant distortion, then seek the ways of light or wisdom."

    that is in the late stages of 4d, naturally.

      •
    « Next Oldest | Next Newest »

    Users browsing this thread:



    Messages In This Thread
    Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by Steppingfeet - 07-05-2010, 09:36 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by JoshC - 07-06-2010, 02:12 AM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by Ali Quadir - 07-06-2010, 03:43 AM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by Namaste - 07-06-2010, 05:47 AM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by Steppingfeet - 07-06-2010, 01:07 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by Phoenix - 07-07-2010, 05:20 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by Aaron - 07-06-2010, 02:20 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by Monica - 07-06-2010, 07:57 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by Aaron - 07-07-2010, 10:43 AM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by Namaste - 07-06-2010, 06:02 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by Steppingfeet - 07-08-2010, 12:15 AM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by Namaste - 07-07-2010, 08:07 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by unity100 - 07-08-2010, 06:31 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by Steppingfeet - 07-08-2010, 06:41 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by unity100 - 07-08-2010, 08:43 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by βαθμιαίος - 07-08-2010, 11:28 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by Steppingfeet - 07-09-2010, 07:01 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by unity100 - 07-09-2010, 09:08 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by βαθμιαίος - 07-12-2010, 10:23 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by Steppingfeet - 07-12-2010, 11:09 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by βαθμιαίος - 07-13-2010, 11:05 AM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by unity100 - 07-13-2010, 11:10 AM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by βαθμιαίος - 07-13-2010, 12:49 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by Steppingfeet - 07-13-2010, 09:02 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by Steppingfeet - 07-09-2010, 12:35 AM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by unity100 - 07-09-2010, 11:20 AM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by Steppingfeet - 07-09-2010, 09:28 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by unity100 - 07-10-2010, 11:05 AM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by Steppingfeet - 07-12-2010, 09:42 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by unity100 - 07-13-2010, 12:36 AM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by unity100 - 07-09-2010, 05:42 AM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by unity100 - 07-09-2010, 09:43 AM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by unity100 - 07-13-2010, 01:01 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by βαθμιαίος - 07-13-2010, 01:15 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by unity100 - 07-13-2010, 01:41 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by βαθμιαίος - 07-13-2010, 03:23 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by unity100 - 07-13-2010, 03:51 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by βαθμιαίος - 07-13-2010, 05:11 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by unity100 - 07-13-2010, 05:45 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by βαθμιαίος - 07-13-2010, 06:35 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by unity100 - 07-13-2010, 06:43 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by βαθμιαίος - 07-13-2010, 07:06 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by unity100 - 07-13-2010, 09:11 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by Phoenix - 07-16-2010, 12:11 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by unity100 - 07-16-2010, 12:18 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by unity100 - 07-14-2010, 10:48 AM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by Steppingfeet - 07-15-2010, 01:33 AM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by unity100 - 07-15-2010, 02:42 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by Monica - 07-15-2010, 03:58 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by Monica - 07-15-2010, 04:42 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by unity100 - 07-15-2010, 04:07 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by Richard - 07-15-2010, 05:04 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by unity100 - 07-15-2010, 05:10 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by Monica - 07-15-2010, 05:13 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by Namaste - 07-15-2010, 06:16 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by unity100 - 07-15-2010, 08:02 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by Monica - 07-15-2010, 11:54 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by Namaste - 07-16-2010, 05:52 AM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by Richard - 07-16-2010, 11:07 AM

    • View a Printable Version
    • Subscribe to this thread

    © Template Design by D&D - Powered by MyBB

    Connect with L/L Research on Social Media

    Linear Mode
    Threaded Mode