09-26-2014, 06:36 PM
Hmm, well I do get what you are saying although I still don't see/understanding how you are making the division of "inner" and "outer". What are those exactly? Do you mean space/time and time/space in that red-ray is polarized to space/time forming a gradient with violet-ray polarized in time/space? Not sure what you mean by inner and outer so that kind of puts a block on the idea for me.
If I am to translate this musically, I see the individual being as a musical chord, the "key" of the chord corresponds with the yellow-ray or whichever body is currently in activation, and then the other bodies, through potentiation, modify the "tone" or harmony of that key tone. In this way, I would equate physicality with "timbre", in that physicality is actually the perception of energy according to particular qualities.
The quality of physicality is that of tangibility. I do agree that red-ray is responsible for the tangibility of any density. However, I disagree that it is solely responsible for the appearances.
Were I to use the analogy of a painted sculpture I would consider red-ray to be the raw material, orange-ray is the form applied to the raw material, yellow-ray is the paint, the colouring and "fleshing out" of the form through tones, green-ray would be the feeling or mood the colouring and form together form, blue-ray would be the many possible interpretations according to its design, what it communicates, indigo-ray would be the raw idea or concept itself inherent in the sculpture, and violet-ray is the fact that is itself, individuated, yet is also an extension of the sculptor.
So I agree that the red-ray forms the basis for physicality (raw material), but I believe the "appearances" we perceive are a feature of the yellow-ray painting over the orange-ray (individuation of the raw material), or in otherwords, it is through the yellow-ray that things have "characteristics". At least, that is how it appears to me.
If I am to translate this musically, I see the individual being as a musical chord, the "key" of the chord corresponds with the yellow-ray or whichever body is currently in activation, and then the other bodies, through potentiation, modify the "tone" or harmony of that key tone. In this way, I would equate physicality with "timbre", in that physicality is actually the perception of energy according to particular qualities.
The quality of physicality is that of tangibility. I do agree that red-ray is responsible for the tangibility of any density. However, I disagree that it is solely responsible for the appearances.
Were I to use the analogy of a painted sculpture I would consider red-ray to be the raw material, orange-ray is the form applied to the raw material, yellow-ray is the paint, the colouring and "fleshing out" of the form through tones, green-ray would be the feeling or mood the colouring and form together form, blue-ray would be the many possible interpretations according to its design, what it communicates, indigo-ray would be the raw idea or concept itself inherent in the sculpture, and violet-ray is the fact that is itself, individuated, yet is also an extension of the sculptor.
So I agree that the red-ray forms the basis for physicality (raw material), but I believe the "appearances" we perceive are a feature of the yellow-ray painting over the orange-ray (individuation of the raw material), or in otherwords, it is through the yellow-ray that things have "characteristics". At least, that is how it appears to me.