Bring4th Forums
  • Login Register
    Login
    Username:
    Password:
  • Archive Home
  • Members
  • Team
  • Help
  • More
    • About Us
    • Library
    • L/L Research Store
User Links
  • Login Register
    Login
    Username:
    Password:

    Menu Home Today At a Glance Members CSC & Team Help
    Also visit... About Us Library Blog L/L Research Store Adept Biorhythms

    As of Friday, August 5th, 2022, the Bring4th forums on this page have been converted to a permanent read-only archive. If you would like to continue your journey with Bring4th, the new forums are now at https://discourse.bring4th.org.

    You are invited to enjoy many years worth of forum messages brought forth by our community of seekers. The site search feature remains available to discover topics of interest. (July 22, 2022) x

    Bring4th Bring4th Studies Strictly Law of One Material Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another?

    Thread: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another?


    Monica (Offline)

    Account Closed
    Posts: 7,043
    Threads: 151
    Joined: Dec 2008
    #8
    07-06-2010, 07:57 PM
    (07-06-2010, 02:20 PM)Aaron Wrote: I think the reason why spiritually enlightened teachers don't disseminate pure information, but instead speak in parables or tailor their message, is that one cannot move another into their open heart. One can guide another towards their open heart. One can point out to another that they are walking on a spiritual path, but one cannot actually walk the path for another. Communicating the Truth to another by way of metaphor or some other creative way must be the most effective way, or the Buddha and Jesus would have gone around speaking of the universal order of things.

    I agree but wonder whether it might be more than that. Since Jesus, Buddha, and other masters were still in 3D bodies, wouldn't there have still been some degree of distortion/coloration of the info they retrieved? Even though they penetrated the veil, does that mean they penetrated it completely?

    Look at how modern-day psychics and channels often color their info with their own biases. Granted, most are probably not spiritual avatars on the level of a Jesus or Buddha, but still...Look at how Cayce colored the info he got from the Akashic Records with a Christian flavor...

    At the time the 'holy books' of the world's various religions were written, there simply didn't exist in the vocabulary such terminology as densities, etc. Maybe none of them mentioned these topics because they wouldn't have been understood by their target audience. Or maybe even these avatars didn't retrieve those items of info because they weren't deemed relevant at the time...it was more important to teach love and forgiveness...Or maybe they didn't pass on that info because they didn't penetrate the veil enough to fully grasp the concepts themselves, not having had the benefit of a modern-day upbringing accustomed to science fiction, etc.

    Aside from topics such as alternate timelines in the possibility/probability vortex, densities, STS/STO paths, those avatars did explore many of the topics covered in the Law of One. Jesus spoke of being "One with the Father" and loving your neighbor as yourself (implying Oneness). Yogananda described states of bliss, traveling the Cosmos (expanded awareness). Many secret magickal societies understood the chakras. Primitive shamans understood about "dreaming the future," soul retrieval, and other advanced spiritual concepts.

    If we were to catalog all the topics covered in the Law of One, I would guess that the vast majority of them have indeed been covered by psychics, shamans, sages, and avatars, although cloaked in myth, mystery and parable. The notable exceptions being the 2 paths as both being valid. But all conventional religions acknowledge the 2 paths. Just the 'valid' part is missing.

    Even then, there are hints...The Bible says "all things work together for good" ..."love your enemies" ...and that "God" created "Satan" ...though of course these obscure scriptures are often glossed over.

    Maybe the topics have been covered previously, but just not with such clear articulation. This was made possible by the type of contact, which we know took some time before being available to Ra. We got a direct transmission from Ra, whereas all those other spiritual masters had the knowledge filtered thru their own consciousness, thus adding their own biases and flavorings.

      •
    « Next Oldest | Next Newest »

    Users browsing this thread:



    Messages In This Thread
    Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by Steppingfeet - 07-05-2010, 09:36 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by JoshC - 07-06-2010, 02:12 AM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by Ali Quadir - 07-06-2010, 03:43 AM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by Namaste - 07-06-2010, 05:47 AM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by Steppingfeet - 07-06-2010, 01:07 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by Phoenix - 07-07-2010, 05:20 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by Aaron - 07-06-2010, 02:20 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by Monica - 07-06-2010, 07:57 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by Aaron - 07-07-2010, 10:43 AM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by Namaste - 07-06-2010, 06:02 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by Steppingfeet - 07-08-2010, 12:15 AM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by Namaste - 07-07-2010, 08:07 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by unity100 - 07-08-2010, 06:31 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by Steppingfeet - 07-08-2010, 06:41 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by unity100 - 07-08-2010, 08:43 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by βαθμιαίος - 07-08-2010, 11:28 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by Steppingfeet - 07-09-2010, 07:01 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by unity100 - 07-09-2010, 09:08 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by βαθμιαίος - 07-12-2010, 10:23 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by Steppingfeet - 07-12-2010, 11:09 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by βαθμιαίος - 07-13-2010, 11:05 AM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by unity100 - 07-13-2010, 11:10 AM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by βαθμιαίος - 07-13-2010, 12:49 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by Steppingfeet - 07-13-2010, 09:02 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by Steppingfeet - 07-09-2010, 12:35 AM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by unity100 - 07-09-2010, 11:20 AM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by Steppingfeet - 07-09-2010, 09:28 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by unity100 - 07-10-2010, 11:05 AM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by Steppingfeet - 07-12-2010, 09:42 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by unity100 - 07-13-2010, 12:36 AM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by unity100 - 07-09-2010, 05:42 AM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by unity100 - 07-09-2010, 09:43 AM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by unity100 - 07-13-2010, 01:01 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by βαθμιαίος - 07-13-2010, 01:15 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by unity100 - 07-13-2010, 01:41 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by βαθμιαίος - 07-13-2010, 03:23 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by unity100 - 07-13-2010, 03:51 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by βαθμιαίος - 07-13-2010, 05:11 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by unity100 - 07-13-2010, 05:45 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by βαθμιαίος - 07-13-2010, 06:35 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by unity100 - 07-13-2010, 06:43 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by βαθμιαίος - 07-13-2010, 07:06 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by unity100 - 07-13-2010, 09:11 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by Phoenix - 07-16-2010, 12:11 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by unity100 - 07-16-2010, 12:18 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by unity100 - 07-14-2010, 10:48 AM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by Steppingfeet - 07-15-2010, 01:33 AM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by unity100 - 07-15-2010, 02:42 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by Monica - 07-15-2010, 03:58 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by Monica - 07-15-2010, 04:42 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by unity100 - 07-15-2010, 04:07 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by Richard - 07-15-2010, 05:04 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by unity100 - 07-15-2010, 05:10 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by Monica - 07-15-2010, 05:13 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by Namaste - 07-15-2010, 06:16 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by unity100 - 07-15-2010, 08:02 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by Monica - 07-15-2010, 11:54 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by Namaste - 07-16-2010, 05:52 AM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by Richard - 07-16-2010, 11:07 AM

    • View a Printable Version
    • Subscribe to this thread

    © Template Design by D&D - Powered by MyBB

    Connect with L/L Research on Social Media

    Linear Mode
    Threaded Mode