(08-16-2014, 03:27 PM)Adonai One Wrote: I like how people interpret these statements as absolute. Could it be that if you die with bitterness for human life and Earth, you may want to return to heal that bitterness, not HAVE TO?
Bitterness is painful when prolonged. It is nice to heal. But there is no compelling force other than the self, there is no HAVE TO.
I guess "need to" would be a better word to use than "have to". But as Ra taught us, it's not true that we can just go to any density we want willy-nilly, we can only choose to go back to densities we already graduated from.
At a higher level, we, as one, have decided on the rules of the game, in that sense one can say anything we do and anything that happens to us as the consequence of what we do is our own choice. But at the 3D level, we can be misled.
69.17
"Ra: ... Firstly, we may note the situation wherein an entity gets a road map which is poorly marked and in fact is quite incorrect. The entity sets out to its destination. It wishes only to reach the point of destination but, becoming confused by the faulty authority and not knowing the territory through which it drives, it becomes hopelessly lost.
Free will does not mean that there will be no circumstances when calculations will be awry. This is so in all aspects of the life experience. Although there are no mistakes, there are surprises."
If Robin Williams was "hopelessly lost" and committed suicide, then it is not incorrect to say that he "has to" repeat 3D -- if my interpretation of Ra's statement (69.6) is correct. But you can also say it's his choice to repeat 3D, for like all of us, we entered this game (Logos) by agreeing to obey the rules/ways we set for ourselves. The wording reflects two different perspectives.