07-05-2010, 05:05 PM
(07-05-2010, 04:39 PM)Bring4th_Monica Wrote:(07-05-2010, 04:25 PM)unity100 Wrote: it doesnt matter whether we take it chronologically, or in a priority manner or in a cause-effect manner ; since Ra describes it as first there existing infinity, and infinity being the first thing there is, and then putting each in a sequence, it means that there was either a 'chronological' sequence, or a priority sequence, or an importance sequence, or a cause-effect sequence, or a hierarchy.
the thing is, there was a sequence/order as Ra tells us, whatever that sequence/order is.
OK. Good response!
and moreover, there is one point i am concerned with ;
ra says it was declared that creator should know itself, and it would do this freely. then, it gave free will to itself.
now, there is a very important issue here.
if, it was the creator doing this declaration/decision (aka infinite intelligence), then it means that creator, infinite intelligence WAS there before second distortion love.
but, and this is the quite important point ;
if, the creator/infinite intelligence was NOT there when this declaration is being made, this has a very important conclusion aside from maybe making the intelligent infinity and second distortion love closer :
that means there is an even higher existential principle that does the declaration in ways which the creator will know itself.
(07-05-2010, 04:49 PM)Poffo Wrote: While I find this side-discussion highly interesting and amusing, how does it all relate to the original post/topic?
imo loosely.
side branch of a side branch, brainstorming and muses and inspiration got this side discussion to this point.