(07-05-2010, 10:43 AM)LsavedSmeD Wrote: I guess you did not read my post thoroughly.
No matter which density/octave that you reside or vibrate all that is in existence springs entirely from love. All illusion/densities are created of light and light is the expression of love. Why you must be so technical about such a simple reasoning is confusing to me, distorting even more the essence of all that is.
refer to my 1 or 2 earlier post in regard to this, that i have replied to namaste.
second distortion 'love' is not 4d, green ray love.
Quote:27.12 Questioner: I would like for you to define love in its sense as the second distortion.
Ra: I am Ra. This must be defined against the background of intelligent infinity or unity or the One Creator with the primal distortion of free will. The term Love then may be seen as the focus, the choice of attack, the type of energy of an extremely, shall we say, high order which causes intelligent energy to be formed from the potential of intelligent infinity in just such and such a way. This then may be seen to be an object rather than an activity by some of your peoples, and the principle of this extremely strong energy focus being worshipped as the Creator instead of unity or oneness from which all Loves emanate.
27.13 Questioner: Is there a manifestation of love that we could call vibration?
Ra: I am Ra. Again we reach semantic difficulties.The vibration or density of love or understanding is not a term used in the same sense as the second distortion, Love; the distortion Love being the great activator and primal co-Creator of various creations using intelligent infinity; the vibration love being that density in which those who have learned to do an activity called “loving” without significant distortion, then seek the ways of light or wisdom. Thus in vibratory sense love comes into light in the sense of the activity of unity in its free will. Love uses light and has the power to direct light in its distortions. Thus vibratory complexes recapitulate in reverse the creation in its unity, thus showing the rhythm or flow of the great heartbeat, if you will use this analogy.
this is a technical matter. it is very technical and also important - confusing the second distortion 'love' with the activity of 'loving' in 4d (in Ra's words), and the understanding and density of 'love' of 4d, is, wrong. both are named as love, because in english language a proper term for differentiating those two does not exist. in various other languages and cultures, it does. however, its not easy to translate these words into english.