08-07-2014, 01:51 AM
(08-06-2014, 01:48 PM)andreazzi Wrote: ...
Now I do understand all the densities as having "aware life", but from that point of view, what is the difference between a first density planet and a rocky "dead" planet? What triggers the concept of first density life, or elemental awareness, since there are no biological organisms evolved in this density?
Ah, I think you are confused because you assume that there are planets that are "dead", i.e. that are not of any density.
Recall
16.26 Questioner: Well, roughly how many total planets in this galaxy of stars that we’re in have aware life regardless of density?
Ra: I am Ra. Approximately six seven, oh oh oh, oh oh oh [67,000,000].
I think Don made the same implicit assumption as you that there were planets without aware life (i.e. not of any densities). Because this assumption is not directly stated, Ra did not correct it. Read the Q&A again carefully. Ra gave the number of the planets Don asked, it is us who would assume that this number is not actually/the same as the total planets that's out there.
Ra tried to make all his statement as precise as possible using the vocabulary available, that's why it is very hard to read sometimes. Whenever the assumption was directly stated, Ra would pointed it out if it was wrong. But when the assumption is implicit, I don't think Ra can catch it (you can't blame him for he/it is not human . This is also why Ra encouraged L/L Research group to study the relevant materials to come up with well stated questions.
But if you know the place in Ra Material where Ra indicated the existence of planets that were not of any density, can you let me know? I could have missed it.