The purpose of The Law of One is the "Law of One"?

[Unbound]

(52.11) Questioner: Thank you. Just a little point that was bothering me of no real importance.

Well, is there then, from the point of view of an individual who wishes to follow the service-to-others path from our present position in third density, is there anything of importance other than disciplines of personality, knowledge of self, and strengthening of will?

Ra: I am Ra. This is technique. This is not the heart. Let us examine the heart of evolution.

Let us remember that we are all one. This is the great learning/teaching. In this unity lies love. This is a great learn/teaching. In this unity lies light. This is the fundamental teaching of all planes of existence in materialization. Unity, love, light, and joy; this is the heart of evolution of the spirit.

The second-ranking lessons are learn/taught in meditation and in service. At some point the mind/body/spirit complex is so smoothly activated and balanced by these central thoughts or distortions that the techniques you have mentioned become quite significant. However, the universe, its mystery unbroken, is one. Always begin and end in the Creator, not in technique.

I believe that on this website there is often a mix and blend between these two things in discussion and it is not always differentiated when individuals are discussing the Law of One direct, or discussing the second-ranking lessons involving service and meditation. Both, I believe, are equally valid and worthy of discussion, as afterall, there is no right or wrong, and indeed there are plenty of those on this website who are indeed aspiring as healers and positive adepts so the discussion of balancing techniques and other such things cannot be said to be outside of meaningful discussion in relation to the Law of One material as they are directly pertinent to the application of the Law of One.

That anyone may disagree or have alternative techniques for application doesn't in any way take away the usefulness of any one technique if applied towards the intended activity. Each individual becomes an adept in a unique way that reveals itself to that individual, so technique is really something to be discerned by each for each. That we can agree on the heart, I believe, does not necessitate the agreement on technique.