Thought is approaching things from the rational/logical/mental/"space-time-ish" side.
Feeling is approaching things from a spiritual/intuitive/"time-space-ish" side.
They are two sides of the same coin though. Thought is seeing a cognitive object from a more separated perspective (outside looking in). Keeping in mind, of course, that mental activity is still more "inner" than body consciousness activity, yet not as "inner" as spiritual activity. Emotion is looking at a cognitive object from a more synthesized perspective (inside looking out).
Every thought has a emotional charge, however, sometimes the charge is not consciously perceptible. If the focus of thought is very similar to your current focus of thought, or perspective, the emotional charge is not readily perceptible because the emotional charge is your perception of a thoughts capacity or power to change your reality, and also a measure of how that power to change resonates with your higher self perspective. So if your thoughts are just perpetuating what already is, it will just be seen as "mental activity" as opposed to "mental/emotive" activity. And if I were a betting man, that would be the distinction I would say Ra was making when delineating these concepts separately.
So if your thought resonates closer to your higher self focus of thought, or perspective, you perceive the charge as "positive", and if the focus of thought resonates further away from your higher self perspective the charge is perceived as "negative".
There is also the outer manifestation of emotion felt viscerally, and chemically, within the physical body itself. The synthesized perspective clothes itself in outer biological processes. The "chemical cocktail" as it were that we, in the physical, have come to know and appreciate, and on occasion, dread.
Feeling is approaching things from a spiritual/intuitive/"time-space-ish" side.
They are two sides of the same coin though. Thought is seeing a cognitive object from a more separated perspective (outside looking in). Keeping in mind, of course, that mental activity is still more "inner" than body consciousness activity, yet not as "inner" as spiritual activity. Emotion is looking at a cognitive object from a more synthesized perspective (inside looking out).
Every thought has a emotional charge, however, sometimes the charge is not consciously perceptible. If the focus of thought is very similar to your current focus of thought, or perspective, the emotional charge is not readily perceptible because the emotional charge is your perception of a thoughts capacity or power to change your reality, and also a measure of how that power to change resonates with your higher self perspective. So if your thoughts are just perpetuating what already is, it will just be seen as "mental activity" as opposed to "mental/emotive" activity. And if I were a betting man, that would be the distinction I would say Ra was making when delineating these concepts separately.
So if your thought resonates closer to your higher self focus of thought, or perspective, you perceive the charge as "positive", and if the focus of thought resonates further away from your higher self perspective the charge is perceived as "negative".
There is also the outer manifestation of emotion felt viscerally, and chemically, within the physical body itself. The synthesized perspective clothes itself in outer biological processes. The "chemical cocktail" as it were that we, in the physical, have come to know and appreciate, and on occasion, dread.
![[+]](https://www.bring4th.org/forums/images/collapse_collapsed.png)