Well whoever did it, did a really good job. But notice Namaste said 'near-perfect.' Real ones are perfect. That's what makes them so amazing!
This one lacks the shimmer of the real ones. Notice the shadings. They are uneven. Don't just look at the lines. Look at the shadings and compare them to the real ones. There is a huge difference.
Also, if you look on the outer perimeter, you will see an obvious error. One side is fatter than the other. That's a sure sign of being fake. Not to mention the huge glob of mud, apparently left behind by vehicles.
It's a testament to the creativity of human circlemakers that they can do such a good job. But if you look closely, you can see the difference, even without the scientific analysis (which will surely come soon) which shows that the real ones have unmistakable attributes (radiation, bending of the stalks, etc.).
This one lacks the shimmer of the real ones. Notice the shadings. They are uneven. Don't just look at the lines. Look at the shadings and compare them to the real ones. There is a huge difference.
Also, if you look on the outer perimeter, you will see an obvious error. One side is fatter than the other. That's a sure sign of being fake. Not to mention the huge glob of mud, apparently left behind by vehicles.
It's a testament to the creativity of human circlemakers that they can do such a good job. But if you look closely, you can see the difference, even without the scientific analysis (which will surely come soon) which shows that the real ones have unmistakable attributes (radiation, bending of the stalks, etc.).