07-05-2014, 04:44 PM
(07-05-2014, 02:15 PM)Gemini Wolf Wrote: Am I right in that pre-veil means they had no free will?
It seems that they had free will as far as the Logoi of the time could conceive of it, but the dropping of the veil enabled such a wide range of free will that Ra typically refers to pre-veil as having no free will.
Quote:77.19 Questioner: Do the Logoi that choose this type of evolution choose both the service-to-self and the service-to-others path for different Logoi, or do they choose just one of the paths?
Ra: I am Ra. Those, what you would call, early Logoi which chose lack-of-free-will foundations, to all extents with no exceptions, founded Logoi of the service-to-others path. The, shall we say, saga of polarity, its consequences and limits, were unimagined until experienced.
77.20 Questioner: In other words you are saying that originally the Logoi that did not choose this free will path did not choose it simply because they had not conceived of it and later Logoi, extending the first distortion farther down through their evolution, experienced it as an outcropping or growth from that extension of the first distortion. Am I correct in saying that?
Ra: I am Ra. Yes.
_____________________________
The only frontier that has ever existed is the self.
The only frontier that has ever existed is the self.