I am an atheist and consider The Law of One plausible

[Unbound]

There is no experience without "us" for "we" are the One turned towards itself, producing a reflection of the "I" in to infinite finities. Thus, without "us", there is no experience for the Creator to have with itself for it can not turn towards itself to experience itself. "Us" and "we" are the unification of all "I"s, singular yet multiple, unified and complete. "I" is suggestive of "not I" as its opposite, which I do not believe.

Also, I am using the standard meaning, the first one on google illustrates well enough.

"at or to the further side of."

You are one of the "further sides" of me, just as I am of you. We perceive a separation in our-self as the duality of conscious and unconscious but really we are one self in which we preside in juxtaposition with ourselves/eachother. Therefore, you are beyond me not because you are better, or superior, or unreachable, but for the simple fact that you are on "the other side" of my conscious self. For me, this comes with no connotation of diminishing to myself, as I am also beyond all others, just as they are beyond me. It is a mutual transcendence in my mind, so there is no inequality or lack of unity in this, just the touching of infinity within.

---

Maybe it would make more sense if I said being beyond is inherent? Aha Or that transcendence is inherent? You like the idea of inheritance aha