I have to admit, this is catalytic for me as I'm struggling to understand you Adonai One (though I know I'll get there).
-----
6-16-14: Your bring4th post made during the second afd discussion; the first afd was not discussed on this forum at all. (This second afd discussion, involving over half-dozen people, eventually closed with a "Keep" decision):
6-19-14: Your bring4th post made right after you nominated the afd-Keep decision of 6-19 for a deletion review. (This week long deletion review, involving over a dozen of people, ended with an "Endorse" of the earlier keep decision):
6-27-14: Your response (emphasis added) made on Wikipedia right after you re-nominated the Law of One page for another afd after the deletion review ended on 6-27 in an endorsement of the earlier keep:
-----
This really doesn't seem like acceptance and loving manifestation. This seems more like control and a battle of wills. I'm not seeing you working with us here on bring4th to improve the page, and it doesn't even seem like you are working with or respecting the community decision making process of wikipedia. I just see a person who wants it his way, or the highway, everything else be damned.
Help me understand.
-----
6-16-14: Your bring4th post made during the second afd discussion; the first afd was not discussed on this forum at all. (This second afd discussion, involving over half-dozen people, eventually closed with a "Keep" decision):
Quote:I bear some pain knowing what I do is not in resonance. I care for the desires and beliefs of others involved. I just cannot support the article as it stands. I will never fight against the structures provided; Wikipedia guidelines are always being followed.
I accept whatever comes.
6-19-14: Your bring4th post made right after you nominated the afd-Keep decision of 6-19 for a deletion review. (This week long deletion review, involving over a dozen of people, ended with an "Endorse" of the earlier keep decision):
Quote:Wikipedia shall decide. I am just one editor.
And I would prune it again as the sources are not the kind of material I wanted cited as fact in this world. Wikipedia can decide if it agrees.
6-27-14: Your response (emphasis added) made on Wikipedia right after you re-nominated the Law of One page for another afd after the deletion review ended on 6-27 in an endorsement of the earlier keep:
Quote:* Procedural Keep - The previous AFD just last week found there was sufficient sources and notability to keep. The Deletion review found that there was no error in that determination. While consensus may change over time, this AFD was started a day after the previous KEEP and ENDORSE, which strikes me as a desire to delete at any price, and seems a bit disruptive. Note: I was the closing admin for the last AFD.Dennis Brown | 2¢ | WER 02:09, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
Objection - I am following Wikipedia policy and acting within what is freely enabled and permitted. I have not acted against any general guideline and I will accept the inevitable consensus these discussions will bring. --Immanuel Thoughtmaker (talk) 02:12, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
-----
This really doesn't seem like acceptance and loving manifestation. This seems more like control and a battle of wills. I'm not seeing you working with us here on bring4th to improve the page, and it doesn't even seem like you are working with or respecting the community decision making process of wikipedia. I just see a person who wants it his way, or the highway, everything else be damned.
Help me understand.
![[+]](https://www.bring4th.org/forums/images/collapse_collapsed.png)