Here we go again (wikipedia)

[xise]

I think about the long-term. There is no guarantee the article will remain a stub especially with plans to have members summarize the plot of the books on their own and paste it into the article without a secondary source.

This seems to be a change in position from before?

It is true that if you want to prevent any possibility that the Law of One page could contain unreliable or inaccurate statements at some point in the future, complete destruction and deletion of the page would foreclosure that opportunity.

Remind me to never get caught in your crosshairs!