Here we go again (wikipedia)

[βαθμιαίος]

So I guess my main question is why do those who wish to see the Law of One article upheld within this environment feel that way? What is the driving force behind the desire for there to be a Law of One wikipedia article at all? Especially if it is an uphill struggle against an idealistic culture.

I agree with Yossarian that wikipedia isn't quite as uniform as you make it out to be, so the struggle isn't quite as uphill as you suggest. After all, the article has now been kept twice, and the deletion review upheld the second keep.

To answer your question, though, my thinking is this: If the Ra channelings happened as we believe they did, then they are a verifiable piece of evidence that the universe is far different from what many people have been led to believe. Don saw himself as a scientist and was careful to follow scientific procedures, and as a result we have an experiment reproduced over 100 times. It absolutely belongs on wikipedia, because it uses their methodology to blow their worldview to smithereens. (As it has done for all of us who started out as scientific materialists.)