Ra's possible distortion(s)

[Unbound]

These suggestions seem like some major human nitpicking to me but I kind of see your point. I don't really agree with the inferences you have made from the quoted texts as they are majorly coloured, it appears, by your own expectations of what "perfect balance" must look like. For example, the claim that to call oneself humble is a sign of pride is, to me, a projection upon Ra of your own issues with pride or perhaps issues with people/entities claiming themselves to be anything of positive virtue. Also, the negative colouring of taking responsibility is peculiar to me, as I believe it is through taking responsibility that balance is achieved, not by simply extracting oneself from experience. I also highly disagree that a sense of responsibility is equated with a sense of control as Ra clearly views all as themselves and so to assist in balancing through responsibility they are in fact doing the work on their own distortions by that very responsibility.

The distortion towards teaching I also don't see as something needing 'balancing' as I view it that teach/learning is a central core of positive polarity. Yes, it is obvious that Ra has biases towards the positive polarity, and by their own recognition were overbalanced in compassion and spent a long time mastering the ways of wisdom. They are now working on unity, so that in itself means taking direct responsibility for every aspect of one's own experience in order to realize complete unity with all. That also would be my answer to your question whether Ra has to balance the compassion, is that they have already done that balancing and are working on a different order of balance now.

One of the problems I have with the way you have approached this assessment is that you have taken scattered ideas out of the context of the time in which they took place. It's like taking bits and pieces of a persons life and trying to discern their nature through those few bits and pieces. I am sure you have done much more study than that, by all means, but as it's presented here it seems like a patchwork of ideas that have been haphazardly sewn together.

That being said, I believe that if we actually want to help Ra balance the distortions they feel responsible for, it has nothing to do with "helping Ra" and everything to do with helping ourselves. As I understand it, it is not possible in third density to actually pinpoint the distortions of others, so this whole exercise seems flawed to me. I believe that Ra is responsible for and well aware of their own process of balancing and even as "Ra Wanderers" it is of little use to address the self through the lens of supposed distortions abstractly inferred through examination of the words Ra and others of the Confederation have spoken. I think that if we, Ra Wanderer or not, truly want to assist Ra it will be by working with ourselves to more clearly see and work with the Law of One on our level and that if we are Ra wanderers helping them to balance, then theoretically the contexts and contents of our own life should be designed by ourselves for exactly that purpose, so again it appears to be redundant to me to try to pinpoint the possible distortions of the Ra whom was channeled rather than to find, within ourselves, those aspects of ourselves which needs balancing and which will therefore by direct extension aid in the process of balancing Ra is engaged in.