Here we go again (wikipedia)

[Parsons]

You can say you are some kind of "expert" on the Law of One all you want, but you demand proof and evidence in an area which there is none. The law of free will prohibits empirically 'proving' any of this material. In my opinion, if you were directly involved with the Ra channeling, you would have either had to be excluded from the channeling or if you had insisted on being there, you would have prohibited the channeling from ever occurring.

You probably can’t answer this question but I will ask it now since we are in the area that I think this occurred in. I feel this somewhat of a duty of mine to ask this question because Henry Puharich will be visiting me later this month. Was this entity involved in any of these times of which you have just spoken?

Ra: I am Ra. You are quite correct in your assumption that we can speak in no way concerning the entity Henry. If you will consider this entity’s distortions with regard to what you call “proof” you will understand/grasp our predicament.