Here we go again (wikipedia)

[Adonai One]

And... not that bad. Just a misunderstanding of Wiki-policy. I think people need to realize that Wikipedia isn't Britannica. It isn't a round table of experts on subjects asserting their views: It's information from secondary sources considered reliable by the general Wikipedia community.

Any addition, reversion and deletion is contestable. Nothing is permanent. Even deleted articles can be restored.

I am just participating in the collaborative process. Wikipedia is endless change that must be accepted and worked with. People have to be willing to discuss their views and defend them.

---

I have no guilt mainly because I do not feel like I am doing anything permanent, I do not feel like I am restricting anything. Anybody can contest me.

---

If it can be reverted or deleted, it probably should be. If a revert or deletion can be reverted, it probably should be as well. It's a process that tests its own integrity. It prevents stagnation and allows things to accommodate all perspectives.