Here we go again (wikipedia)

[xise]

βαθμιαίος, do you know what Immanuel Thoughtmaker is referring to in his Deletion review comment from June 19 20:18 UTC about "The original article was already deleted for unreliable sources but this copy was not properly nominated"? Is that information accurate?

The history is a little convoluted. This iteration of the Law of One on wikipedia started with an article called The Law of One, which Yossarian began working on in 2011. In July of 2013, the page was moved to The Law of One (Ra Material). In January of 2014, it was moved back to The Law of One.

So somehow, in all the moves, there ended up being two pages, with The Law of One (Ra Material) redirecting to The Law of One. On June 10, the one called The Law of One was deleted. However, that happened after Adonai One/Immanuel Thoughtmaker had pruned the article to a stub, and the deleting admin didn't realize it.

At that point the page called The Law of One (Ra Material) became visible again, I guess because the redirect no longer worked, and Adonai One/Immanuel Thoughtmaker nominated it for deletion, too. Again, he pruned it to a stub while the deletion discussion was ongoing. However, this time his pruning was reverted and the decision was made to keep the page.

So the deletion referred to by "The original article was already deleted for unreliable sources but this copy was not properly nominated" was not appropriate for deletion at the time it was deleted, and the deletion was in fact undone?

If so, then the quoted language sounds like a misleading way to start another deletion discussion. Am I missing something?

p.s. Not sure if I can make heads or tails of the history notes myself, so I didn't link them.