This discussion would likely benefit from questioning A1's intents less and more focussing on what can actually be done to improve the Wiki article in question in an objective manner.
To be perfectly frank, the current state of the article(s) are/were less than satisfactory, so I'm not surprised A1 opted for deletion. The sources are haphazard and do little to reinforce the weighting of the material as is, and are also used incorrectly throughout. They seem forced and out of place in numerous places, and I would genuinely be surprised if said sources were actually consulted for the relevant passages to the LOO. As it currently stands, it detracts from the material and does a disservice in its portrayal of the text.
Improvements involve substantially cutting down article length to provide a cleaner, coherent and more objective view of the material rather than the subjective and out of context interpretation it currently uses. The way it reads right now is not user friendly at all.
E.g. "where a human channeler is said to be aligned with or in harmony with Ra, thus being able to act as a "receiver" for the "vibrations"(in this case: knowledge) emitted by the 6th density intelligence." - What the heck does that even mean?
Sources need to be cut down to a fifth of it's current length to those that are reputable, noteworthy, and as stated in the post above, more in line with reputable press and Newspaper articles. Collating such sources would be easier with the help of LLResearch, who would have a list of noted excerpts in such literature (There was a TV Show featuring Carla and Don if I recall, that would work).
Remove all the talk of densities, rays, cosmology and life. Simply allow for a concise introduction to the material and perhaps notable influence. Some tags or aspects it covers may help, but for the most part anything beyond is unnecessary.
I'll probably take a stab at a rewrite some time, but perhaps the above may help in moving the discussion to more productive endeavours. At the moment alot of this seems to pass for veiled mudslinging.
To be perfectly frank, the current state of the article(s) are/were less than satisfactory, so I'm not surprised A1 opted for deletion. The sources are haphazard and do little to reinforce the weighting of the material as is, and are also used incorrectly throughout. They seem forced and out of place in numerous places, and I would genuinely be surprised if said sources were actually consulted for the relevant passages to the LOO. As it currently stands, it detracts from the material and does a disservice in its portrayal of the text.
Improvements involve substantially cutting down article length to provide a cleaner, coherent and more objective view of the material rather than the subjective and out of context interpretation it currently uses. The way it reads right now is not user friendly at all.
E.g. "where a human channeler is said to be aligned with or in harmony with Ra, thus being able to act as a "receiver" for the "vibrations"(in this case: knowledge) emitted by the 6th density intelligence." - What the heck does that even mean?
Sources need to be cut down to a fifth of it's current length to those that are reputable, noteworthy, and as stated in the post above, more in line with reputable press and Newspaper articles. Collating such sources would be easier with the help of LLResearch, who would have a list of noted excerpts in such literature (There was a TV Show featuring Carla and Don if I recall, that would work).
Remove all the talk of densities, rays, cosmology and life. Simply allow for a concise introduction to the material and perhaps notable influence. Some tags or aspects it covers may help, but for the most part anything beyond is unnecessary.
I'll probably take a stab at a rewrite some time, but perhaps the above may help in moving the discussion to more productive endeavours. At the moment alot of this seems to pass for veiled mudslinging.
![[+]](https://www.bring4th.org/forums/images/collapse_collapsed.png)