(06-16-2014, 04:08 AM)Adonai One Wrote: I have no reverence for Ra nor any other entity associated with it. The existence of the metaphysics within the material concerning chakras and other affair do not concern me. The practical application of the ideal of Oneness and the archetypal mind are my primary concerns, as these have the greatest application for the good of mankind.
Outside of harvest, nearly all references to the rays ("chakras") are done in practical terms of self-balance and as a feedback device for studying the primary forms of love. Ra makes it clear that it is not the rays themselves that are important, but it is the belief-concepts about love they provide feedback upon that is important.
The Ra material seems to imply that the study of the primary forms of love (with or without the use of the rays as the rays themselves are secondary to the concepts they give feedback on) as more fundamental than the archetypal mind, which changes from system to system and changes before and after veiling. Consider how Ra discusses how entities will wanderer densities to interact with others (depending on thier polarity) but also to undistort or balance the love within in themselves (which is reflected by the state of their rays). This is explicitly mentioned in the Ra material. It mentions nothing about the study of a particular local archetypical mind as a motivating factor to wander. This is because, in my opinion, of the structure of the universe and the specificity of the information regarding the archetypical mind:
Oneness-> Concept known to exist within all Octaves
Primary Conceptual Forms of Love (the Rays being feedback devices for these concepts) -> Concepts known to exist throughout this Octave in the same form
Archetypical Mind-> Concept varies significantly within this Octave: form varies depending on the location, density, sub-logos choices, and veiling conditions
Thus, the way I see it, all evidence points to the idea of oneness and the study of the primary forms of love as more fundamental than the archetypical mind which changes based on location in the universe, veiling, and density. While I agree that study of the archetypical mind is of great benefit, it seems that study of the archetypical mind without truly studying and understanding the primary forms of love is an inefficient way to learn about the nature of self and of the universe. It would seem then to teach the Law of One and the Archetypical Mind for the 3D Sol System without addressing and teaching about the primary forms of love which are the basis of this octave to be a disservice. To put another way, once one exits this solar system, or experiences a changes in veiling conditions, or travels to another density, the information about the current 3D Sol Archetypical mind is of limited application, whereas the learnings about oneness and the primary forms of love are completely applicable in their entirety.
Do you disagree with this? Why or why not?
![[+]](https://www.bring4th.org/forums/images/collapse_collapsed.png)