Here we go again (wikipedia)

[reeay]

I'm not sure what the status of this edit-drama/warring is but it's worth having some 'fresh brains' edit this page. To claim something is 'grand reality' could sound very off-the-wall for someone who might not understand philosophical context of 'reality'?

OK Adonai pls feel free to write a literature review on these 30-something resources w/ analytical critique. That way the analysis of the quality of the references cited on page is more transparent. This is what scholars do - they write literature reviews and break apart various studies to make judgments on the quality, validity, reliability, and usefulness of the resources. Annotated bibliography is good, too.