Here we go again (wikipedia)

[yossarian]

In the end, it's subjective. I will continue to cite WP:Questionable for the majority of the sources and insist on their removal based on my judgement that shaky mystical material should not be the foundation of an article.

If people want to restart the article with only that Gnosis article and that one reliable book mentioned in the AFD, then I won't push any further.

However, as the article stands, I will continue to advocate for its deletion.

NO IT'S NOT SUBJECTIVE. THAT'S NOW HOW OBJECTIVE INCLUSION CRITERIA WORKS. IT'S ABOUT AS SUBJECTIVE AS 2+2=4.

YOU DON'T MATTER AND THIS HAS LITTLE TO DO WITH YOU.

YOU'RE JUST A PAWN IN THE ATHEIST/SCIENTIFIC MATERIALIST IDEOLOGICAL BLOCK ON WIKIPEDIA THAT WANTS TO SUPPRESS ALL ARTICLES THAT COVER ALL NON-SCIENTIFIC TOPICS, INCLUDING ALL NEW AGE OR OCCULT OR ESOTERIC TOPICS. NONE OF YOUR ARGUMENTS HAVE ANY VALIDITY WHATSOEVER AND EVERYONE KNOWS IT, INCLUDING THE ADMINS WHO DELETED THE ARTICLE, WHICH IS WHY THEY COVERED UP THEIR ERROR AFTER DOING IT AND MADE COVER-YOUR-ASS PAPERWORK TO PUT THE BLAME ON YOU INSTEAD. YOU ARE LITERALLY BEING BLAMED BY THE DELETIONIST ATHEIST BLOCK FOR THIS DELETION SO THAT THEIR OWN WILL BE SAFE FROM CHARGES OF VANDALISM AND IDEOLOGICAL DELETIONISM.

YOU ARE THEIR PATSY.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!