Here we go again (wikipedia)

[yossarian]

40 sources of which some are ungrounded, op-eds on how we are going to ascend to the 4th-dimension on 2012 that interpret Ra's "service-to-others" in the form of any manner of ethical philosophy.

Do you see how it could fall apart rather quickly?

1. THEY WERE NOT OP-EDS. AN OP-ED IS A SPECIFIC THING PUT OUT BY NEWSPAPERS. ZERO OF THE SOURCES WERE OP-EDS. YOU *****.

2. THEY ARE NOT UNGROUNDED BY THE HUMANITIES DEFINITION OF UNGROUNDED.

3. THEY ARE RELIABLE SOURCES BY WIKIPEDIA'S DEFINITION OF RELIABLE

4. THEY ARE TEXTUALLY ACCURATE IN THAT THEY ACCURATELY CONVEY NOTABLE PERSONS' INTERPRETATIONS OF THE ORIGINAL SOURCE AND ACCURATELY CONVEY POPULAR INTERPRETATIONS OF THE ORIGINAL SOURCES, INTEREPRETATIONS THAT ARE PRECISELY THE INTEREST OF WIKIPEDIA

5. YOUR OPINION ON THE TRUTH OR FALSEHOOD OF THE SUBJECT MATTER OR THE DISCOURSE COMMUNITY OR THE SECONDARY SOURCES DOES NOT MATTER.

6. YOUR OPINION ON THE QUALITY (IN ANY SENSE OF THE WORD QUALITY) OF THE SECONDARY LITERATURE DOES NOT MATTER BECAUSE YOU ADMIT YOU HAVE NOT READ THE SECONDARY LITERATURE. Q E MFING D.

7. YOU DONT KNOW ******** **** ABOUT ****.