"I have no propositions for sources. I am open to any manner of publication as long as its objective. If it's not, then people need to write the article stating the information is OP-ED."
THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS AN OP-ED ON WIKIPEDIA. YOU KNOW NOTHING. NOTHING
YOU MIGHT AS WELL DEMAND THAT THE BIBLE BE LABELED OP-ED
NO IT DOESN'T. THAT'S NOW HOW IT WORKS. DISCLAIMERS ARE FOR SCIENCE ARTICLES AND ARE WHOLLY UNNECESSARY IN THE HUMANITIES BECAUSE ALL CLAIMS ARE CITED AS TEXTUAL FACTS, THAT CITE EITHER SECONDARY SOURCES OR THE ORIGINAL SOURCE. ENCYCLOPEDIAS ONLY USE DISCLAIMERS IF THEY ARE QUOTING OR PARAPHRASING THE DISCLAIMERS MADE BY SECONDARY LITERATURE.
IF YOU EVER GO TO COLLEGE YOU MAY LEARN. PROBABLY NOT.
THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS AN OP-ED ON WIKIPEDIA. YOU KNOW NOTHING. NOTHING
YOU MIGHT AS WELL DEMAND THAT THE BIBLE BE LABELED OP-ED
(06-15-2014, 01:24 AM)Adonai One Wrote: Wikipedia demands that everything be written neutrally. If information is opinion-based in nature and source, it needs to be disclaimed as such.
NO IT DOESN'T. THAT'S NOW HOW IT WORKS. DISCLAIMERS ARE FOR SCIENCE ARTICLES AND ARE WHOLLY UNNECESSARY IN THE HUMANITIES BECAUSE ALL CLAIMS ARE CITED AS TEXTUAL FACTS, THAT CITE EITHER SECONDARY SOURCES OR THE ORIGINAL SOURCE. ENCYCLOPEDIAS ONLY USE DISCLAIMERS IF THEY ARE QUOTING OR PARAPHRASING THE DISCLAIMERS MADE BY SECONDARY LITERATURE.
IF YOU EVER GO TO COLLEGE YOU MAY LEARN. PROBABLY NOT.
![[+]](https://www.bring4th.org/forums/images/collapse_collapsed.png)