Here we go again (wikipedia)

[Adonai One]

I hesitantly approve of Gnosis but sure, why not. The coverage still does not make for a brilliant nor truly accurate article. I am still suspicious of the guys views on channeling. He believes most channeled material is wrong, which is reasonable but it has contorted his overview a bit, in my view. It's a slanted overview and that's my main contention with that article but it's arguable.

My main problem is the sources enabling the article to be objective, not just notable. It can be argued the book is notable enough but can an article be made that is truly objective from the sources given?

---

I have no propositions for sources. I am open to any manner of publication as long as its objective. If it's not, then people need to write the article stating the information is OP-ED.