06-15-2014, 12:18 AM
Just dropping by to propose an idea:
Perhaps you, ladies and gentlemen present, could work together to clarify what a reliable source is according to Wikipedia and why the sources in the Law of One Wikipedia page may or may not have been reliable. Is there a definition of what a reliable source is? Reading this debate, I find that aspect to be unclear.
Another interesting discussion which could take place is; what is, according to each of you, a "good" Wikipedia article? Again, according to you, which parts of the existing Law of One article are good and objective, and which parts need more work to reflect a quality article? Finally, what is your vision of a great article about the Law of One? What would it look like?
Perhaps you, ladies and gentlemen present, could work together to clarify what a reliable source is according to Wikipedia and why the sources in the Law of One Wikipedia page may or may not have been reliable. Is there a definition of what a reliable source is? Reading this debate, I find that aspect to be unclear.
Another interesting discussion which could take place is; what is, according to each of you, a "good" Wikipedia article? Again, according to you, which parts of the existing Law of One article are good and objective, and which parts need more work to reflect a quality article? Finally, what is your vision of a great article about the Law of One? What would it look like?