Reeay has a point about not talking to peers on this forum.
A1, you're a part of this forum. You're a big part of this forum. You've participated in this thread that discusses the state of the wikipedia page many months ago. A thread that makes it clear that many forum members want some sort of page and that they are against deletion/removal of the page.
Yet you apparently get super-involved in the wikipedia page in the last month:
-without publicly discussing it with your friends/peers here on the forum
-removing 30+ sources twice (leaving 1) based on title, author, and subject matter (without reading them) though the admin told you that the page remain as is so everything can be discussed
-and you don't let anyone here know that you're involved in the recent page drama until you are called out by βαθμιαίος.
Something's definitely up. I'd bet good money that you're projecting a personal issue onto the Wikipedia page issue.
A1, you're a part of this forum. You're a big part of this forum. You've participated in this thread that discusses the state of the wikipedia page many months ago. A thread that makes it clear that many forum members want some sort of page and that they are against deletion/removal of the page.
Yet you apparently get super-involved in the wikipedia page in the last month:
-without publicly discussing it with your friends/peers here on the forum
-removing 30+ sources twice (leaving 1) based on title, author, and subject matter (without reading them) though the admin told you that the page remain as is so everything can be discussed
-and you don't let anyone here know that you're involved in the recent page drama until you are called out by βαθμιαίος.
Something's definitely up. I'd bet good money that you're projecting a personal issue onto the Wikipedia page issue.