Here we go again (wikipedia)

[ScottK]

Peer-reviewed academic analysis of The Law of One would be most preferred. I hate academia but they do serve a purpose on Wikipedia.

Peer-reviewed? That's what's wrong with the world. Original ideas are filed away into the circular trash can because other "academics" don't agree.

We thrive on a diversity of well-intentioned ideas, rather than the shout down of "peer review". I don't know what you are thinking of here.....

Do you want an "authority" to cleanse ideas before they enter your brain? Who chooses the "authority" and how do we know they are right?

And BTW, Wilcock may have some weak ideas, but he also has some strong ones too - just like you, just like all of us..