06-14-2014, 05:56 PM
(This post was last modified: 06-14-2014, 06:25 PM by Adonai One.)
The book deserves a better article with better sources. Until those sources are found, I will not stand to see the material interpreted in a flimsy, slanted and overtly-mystical manner.
As it is/was, the article is/was a New Age opinion editorial.
My intentions are simply to have The Law of One objectively interpreted and represented. Anybody is free to recreate the article with appropriate sources and material.
I have too much respect for the material to see it slandered by what this article currently aims to become.
From the wise:
As it is/was, the article is/was a New Age opinion editorial.
My intentions are simply to have The Law of One objectively interpreted and represented. Anybody is free to recreate the article with appropriate sources and material.
I have too much respect for the material to see it slandered by what this article currently aims to become.
From the wise:
(03-03-2013, 06:32 PM)zenmaster Wrote: It should probably be deleted, as the way it currently reads is severely misleading.