Here we go again (wikipedia)

[yossarian]

What's interesting is that over the years, people have added and mentioned more and more sources. There are well over 40 sources now that discuss The Law of One books.

This makes The Law of One books absolutely qualify according to wikipedia rules. But wikipedia editors often don't know and don't follow wikipedia rules. They delete stuff based on their personal snap judgements--mostly about whether they like the content or have heard of it before in some positive light.

It's not just esoteric books that get pruned off wikipedia--it's everything that doesn't appear on TV basically. If it hasn't been on TV, if CNN hasn't mentioned it, these dolts don't consider it knowledge, they don't consider it cultural activity. They don't even care if it's been covered in academic journals, because (and I've been told this multiple times) the particular admins deleting stuff are not able to access the journals to verify the citations that are given.

Literally--they delete stuff that cites academic journals because they are too incompetent to go to the library and access the journals themselves.

It would be funny if wikipedia didn't have the strongest SEO in the entire world.