05-29-2014, 10:29 AM
I think our greatest, most fundamental and profound communication of the actual Law of One happens through being, what Ra calls our "radiation of realization of Oneness with the Creator".
On that level it is literally effortless. It is the energy that emanates from us as a function of our own conscious depth of realization of oneness. The less the individual "i" (or the more transparent it is), the greater the strength and purity of this emanation.
That, along with other heart-centered modes of service, is a more important way to communicate and disseminate the Law of One, in my opinion.
One problem of trying to share/promte the actual material is the danger of engaging the energies of evangelism and proselytism. The Law of One student has seen the historical havoc these energies have wreaked upon populations, and also intuitively understands the general inefficacy of this method, especially as it skirts, or outright abridges, the boundary of free will.
Secondly, like Fang was getting at, this information is light years outside the conceptual box that forms the mental environment for most. People don't have a context for it, no frame of reference, no structure to adequately understand/process this information. There are many intermediate steps necessary to walk before most people could even consider the possibility that there may be veracity in Ra's words, or that there even is a "Ra".
As such, reactions of rejection or ridicule are reliable safe bets. However, hats off to you, Guardian, for wearing the outward form of this philosophy on your sleeve! I drop hints here and there in my own path regarding this information, but I have yet to be as open. I feel I can be more effective in service through other means.
But I've had this basic thought in the back of my mind for some time. In the movie "Milk" where Sean Penn plays the first openly gay elected official in San Francisco in the 70's, the character says something about how all gay people need to come out of the closet and make themselves known. When people began to realize that they're brother, or mother, or co-worker, or friend was gay, it would make it more commonplace, and help it be less taboo and repressed. In other words, it would engender acceptance. I've wondered the same regarding the unorthodox beliefs many of us hold.
This action has helped you connect with others of like-mind, and I think that a positive end.
But as has been the case and continues to be, my own conclusion is that it's better only to share when genuine, actual interest is detected. Though there is a place for the dropping of seeds to gauge that interest.
Love/Light, GLB
On that level it is literally effortless. It is the energy that emanates from us as a function of our own conscious depth of realization of oneness. The less the individual "i" (or the more transparent it is), the greater the strength and purity of this emanation.
That, along with other heart-centered modes of service, is a more important way to communicate and disseminate the Law of One, in my opinion.
One problem of trying to share/promte the actual material is the danger of engaging the energies of evangelism and proselytism. The Law of One student has seen the historical havoc these energies have wreaked upon populations, and also intuitively understands the general inefficacy of this method, especially as it skirts, or outright abridges, the boundary of free will.
Secondly, like Fang was getting at, this information is light years outside the conceptual box that forms the mental environment for most. People don't have a context for it, no frame of reference, no structure to adequately understand/process this information. There are many intermediate steps necessary to walk before most people could even consider the possibility that there may be veracity in Ra's words, or that there even is a "Ra".
As such, reactions of rejection or ridicule are reliable safe bets. However, hats off to you, Guardian, for wearing the outward form of this philosophy on your sleeve! I drop hints here and there in my own path regarding this information, but I have yet to be as open. I feel I can be more effective in service through other means.
But I've had this basic thought in the back of my mind for some time. In the movie "Milk" where Sean Penn plays the first openly gay elected official in San Francisco in the 70's, the character says something about how all gay people need to come out of the closet and make themselves known. When people began to realize that they're brother, or mother, or co-worker, or friend was gay, it would make it more commonplace, and help it be less taboo and repressed. In other words, it would engender acceptance. I've wondered the same regarding the unorthodox beliefs many of us hold.
This action has helped you connect with others of like-mind, and I think that a positive end.
But as has been the case and continues to be, my own conclusion is that it's better only to share when genuine, actual interest is detected. Though there is a place for the dropping of seeds to gauge that interest.
Love/Light, GLB
Explanation by the tongue makes most things clear, but love unexplained is clearer. - Rumi