Thanks for clarifying, Jeremy!
And thanks for making the distinction between David's ideas and Ra's teachings. David has said that his Ra is not an extension of the Law of One contact. I know there has been a bit of confusion, with the name being the same.
I'm not going to comment on David himself, beyond what I've already said about his work being subject to the same discernment as any other. My personal philosophy is that I prefer to discuss ideas and concepts, rather than specific people. Therefore, I will limit my participation in this discussion to that which explores ideas (whether they are his, Ra's, yours, mine, or anyone else's), rather than him (or anyone else) as a person.
And thanks for making the distinction between David's ideas and Ra's teachings. David has said that his Ra is not an extension of the Law of One contact. I know there has been a bit of confusion, with the name being the same.
I'm not going to comment on David himself, beyond what I've already said about his work being subject to the same discernment as any other. My personal philosophy is that I prefer to discuss ideas and concepts, rather than specific people. Therefore, I will limit my participation in this discussion to that which explores ideas (whether they are his, Ra's, yours, mine, or anyone else's), rather than him (or anyone else) as a person.