The question of Appropriateness

[Plenum]

Ra uses the word 'appropriate' a total of 155 times in their answers. In contrast, Don uses the word 39 times in his questioning process.

Ra: http://www.lawofone.info/results.php?q=a...ull-search
Don: http://www.lawofone.info/results.php?q=a...e&l=30&o=r

so what is this question of appropriateness?

what is appropriate between 2 entities? what is appropriate as a form of conduct? what is appropriate being measured against, to determine what is appropriate and not appropriate?

after giving this some thought, and in the context of the Law of Free Will/Confusion, I sort of arrived at a tentative understanding of 'appropriateness'.

Appropriateness would only seem to be relevant in respect to one's own philosophical system. The beliefs and the principles that one self-subscribes to.

for eg, for an entity that is seeking to polarise positively, there are certain thoughts/behaviours that are incompatible with moving in such a direction. This is not being moralistic or judgemental towards oneself, but its just that there are certain traits that are indicative of a separative attitude. For eg, a cold calculated murder like poisoning another human being would generally be incompatible with a positive-oriented philosophy. But that is something that is self-assessed for 'appropriateness' relative to one's own belief structure.

and likewise, for the negative path, their behaviours and conduct are perfectly 'appropriate' for their path of polarization, but such conduct would be wildly inappropriate for an entity on the positive direction.

and so, in truth, to paraphrase a quote - there is no right and wrong, but only what is appropriate. And what is 'appropriate' can only be gauged against one's own striving process.