Why I do not consider the metaphysical immaterial

[Unbound]

How do you wish to be, manniz?

---

Was the ideal of time/space and space/time as two separate concepts, and not entirely united concept complexes, denoted explicitly in the Law of One material?

The ideal? Not sure what you mean. Time and space are inherently the same thing s/t = t/s = 1. When Ra says space/time, they are either referring to the physical sector or the spatial emphasis on that duality. And when they say time/space, it's either clock time or the metaphysical/temporal/cosmic sector.

These two sectors exist in each density. Each density serves as a vibrational base for manifestation. Within the 1D space/time physical sector, when speeds are below that of light, then "space/time" and" time/space" are aspects of motion which forms all physicality.

So the distinctions are illusory and are not based on any empirical observation?

The empirical observation would be the observation and awareness of an "inner plane" (time/space) and an "outer plane" (space/time).

Distinguished by what? Physical phenoma? Only death? Is death the only differential? Or could the human vision be simply tuned? Is the differential biology or is it simply an aspect of an illusion provided by a construct beyond human knowing?

Dreams occur in time/space, the "inner plane", as well as other forms of shamanic journey and inner meditation. I consider the "inner plane" to be the internal world of experience, where we imagine, visualize, dream, remember and gain inspiration, whereas the "outer plane" is the external world of experience where we use our bodies in the collective reality.

You could say the "outer plane" as space/time is the objective end of the spectrum and the "inner plane" as the time/space is the subjective end. These, of course, are my own interpretations.