Why I do not consider the metaphysical immaterial

[manniz]

Larson is but one interpretation of the cosmic inpourings that constitute our creation. I find myself pressed to consider this a foundation to a discussion.

Oh yeah, pretty dang obviously. Larson is impressive to consider it from traditional science's perspective. And actually did lots of hard work and rigorous thinking. That is far more impressive than random statements and feelings about the technicalities of creation.

Kinda like Tesla's decades long work compared to someone thinking that just because they have read Ra or some other material, they can come up with free energy machines. There are actually many people, who tried to do that, without bothering to learn even basic science. Every conspiracy forum has a thread or two with someone's diagrams of how a free energy machine would be like, without much science or even metaphysical ideas behind it. Tesla was amazing though. So much humility for such extensive body of work.