Why I do not consider the metaphysical immaterial

[Unbound]

If the eternal is properly experience, then would not it be entirely singular figuratively and literally?

The experience is not eternity, that was my point. I see Eternity as a consciousness entity which has an experience, which it eternally experiences but the experience itself is not the same as the entity which is experiencing it. Experience itself isn't anything but occurrence. Rather, what is more constructive is memory or the use of experience. All experience itself is void and voice, but it is the building of words and worlds from that experience that is the architecture of experience.

Singular as a system, yes, but that does not mean that every part is the same part unless you break it down to the actual singular level at which there is no distinction at all and at which level discussion is entirely moot as there is no experience or lack of experience, simply "being-ness" as some say. This goes beyond Eternity to Infinity which I actually view as quite distinct from the concept of Eternity even though Eternity fits within Infinity and vice-versa I find Infinity to be still transcendent of Eternity.