2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose

[unity100]

Where is the disagreement? Both you and Ra are saying that the path of self exists, but it will not lead you back to rejoining the infinite creator that you truly are.

disagreement that exists is, Law of One is not valid for anything under total unity. there are paths, even different dimensions to accommodate entities, if one polarity goes out to accept the other, it is enslaved and it is no more.

trying to practice Law of One, for under anything total unity, becomes unwise, from this respect.

About the morality thing, I completely agree with you. Of course when Ra says there is no right or wrong morals, they are speaking about their own perspective, as well as the perspective of infinity. Right and wrong morals exist as truth only to those who wish to see it that way.

definitely. i very much wonder, therefore, how will the next octave happen, when this polarity problem/experiment is gotten over with.

I agree, and disagree.

Being vs Doing...Q'uo says either focus is acceptable, appreciated and worthy. It is all a matter of choice/perspective essentially.

Godspeed!

my opinion is that, it is extremely unwise and, also damaging to many others, to dislocate an entity from a higher frequency, in which it will be able to radiate much more of the much more needed higher frequency vibrations, and to put it in a limited, quarantined, blocked 3d environment, to fix an experiment gone awry.

if you remember what Ra answered to don's query about the distribution of the population density of different densities, in this galaxy we have a huge lack of higher frequency vibrations in higher frequency planes. whereas we have an extreme amount of 2d vibrations and worlds.

that means, our galaxy is imbalanced in regard to higher densities. entities that are functioning in higher densities are sorely needed, to create a balanced super-being of a galaxy.

lack of this, in my opinion, is creating a lot of problems.